AGLC4 Referencing Guide
Updated 2026-08-07
Quick Answer
AGLC4 (Australian Guide to Legal Citation, 4th edition) is the standard footnote-based citation style for Australian law schools, citing cases, legislation, and secondary sources in numbered footnotes with a bibliography at the end. It is Australia's equivalent to the UK's OSCOLA, not a substitute for it.
AGLC4 is the standard citation style at Australian law schools — a distinct footnote-based system from the UK's OSCOLA, so always confirm which one your specific course actually requires rather than assuming they're interchangeable. This AGLC4 referencing guide covers the core conventions in depth, since the Australian Guide to Legal Citation includes source-specific rules that are easy to get subtly wrong without a clear working reference.
How AGLC4 citations work
- Citations appear as numbered footnotes at the bottom of the page, not in-text parenthetical references
- Each footnote corresponds to a superscript number placed at the relevant point in your text
- A full bibliography listing all sources cited appears at the end of the document, organised by source category (cases, legislation, secondary sources)
What a footnote typically includes
- Cases: case name (italicised), year, volume and abbreviated report series, starting page
- Legislation: short title of the Act (italicised), jurisdiction abbreviation, year, and section pinpoint where relevant
- Secondary sources: author, title (italicised for books, in quotation marks for articles), publication details, and pinpoint page
Always check your law school's current style guide or the official Australian Guide to Legal Citation manual for the precise punctuation and abbreviation conventions for your specific source type, since exact AGLC footnote citation formatting can be easy to get subtly wrong.
Why an AGLC4 referencing guide matters more than a generic legal-citation summary
Generic legal-citation guidance, written with a US or UK audience in mind, often assumes conventions that don't match Australian practice — different case-name italicisation rules, different report-series abbreviations, and a different approach to pinpoint references. An AGLC4 referencing guide written specifically around the Australian Guide to Legal Citation's own rules avoids this mismatch, since even small formatting differences between jurisdictions' legal citation systems can affect how a footnote reads to an Australian law marker who expects AGLC4 conventions specifically.
AGLC footnote citation for cases
Citing a case correctly under AGLC footnote citation conventions means including the case name in italics, the year (in round or square brackets depending on whether the report series is chronological), the volume number and abbreviated report series, and the starting page — with a pinpoint reference added whenever citing a specific passage, page, or paragraph. A common weakness is treating the year notation as interchangeable between round and square brackets, when the Australian Guide to Legal Citation specifies which bracket type applies depending on whether the particular report series identifies volumes by year.
AGLC footnote citation for legislation
Citing legislation under AGLC footnote citation conventions requires the short title of the Act in italics, the jurisdiction abbreviation (such as "Cth" for Commonwealth or "NSW" for New South Wales), the year, and a section pinpoint where a specific provision is being discussed. This AGLC4 referencing guide flags jurisdiction abbreviation as a common source of errors, since a student citing a state Act without the correct jurisdiction abbreviation leaves the citation genuinely ambiguous about which Australian jurisdiction's legislation is actually being referenced.
AGLC footnote citation for secondary sources
Secondary sources — textbooks, journal articles, and other scholarly commentary — follow their own specific AGLC footnote citation conventions under the Australian Guide to Legal Citation: author name, title (italicised for books, in quotation marks for journal articles), publication details, and a pinpoint page for direct quotes or specific claims. Repeated citations to the same secondary source later in a document can use a shortened form, following the same general logic as other footnote-based citation styles like OSCOLA, though the specific abbreviation conventions differ.
Common mistakes
| Mistake | Correction |
|---|---|
| Using OSCOLA or another jurisdiction's legal citation conventions | Confirm your course specifically requires AGLC4, not a UK or US-style system |
| Omitting a pinpoint reference for a direct quote | Include the specific page or paragraph the quote comes from |
| Treating footnotes as optional commentary rather than required citations | Every footnote number in the text should correspond to a substantive citation |
| Using the wrong bracket type around a case's year | Check whether the specific report series requires round or square brackets |
| Omitting the jurisdiction abbreviation for legislation | Include the correct jurisdiction abbreviation so the citation is unambiguous |
Building an AGLC4 bibliography
Beyond the footnotes themselves, the Australian Guide to Legal Citation expects a full bibliography at the end of the document, organised into distinct categories — typically cases, legislation, treaties (where relevant), and secondary sources — each listed alphabetically within its own category rather than merged into one single alphabetical list. This AGLC4 referencing guide recommends building the bibliography progressively as you draft, since reconstructing a complete, correctly categorised bibliography from scratch after a long piece of legal writing is considerably more error-prone than maintaining it alongside your footnotes throughout.
A worked example: checking an AGLC footnote citation for a case
Suppose a draft footnote reads: "Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1, 42." Checking this against Australian Guide to Legal Citation conventions confirms the structure is correct: the case name in italics, the year in round brackets (since the Commonwealth Law Reports are organised by volume rather than strictly by year), the volume and report series abbreviation, the starting page, and a pinpoint reference to page 42 for a specific passage. This kind of careful, source-by-source check against the AGLC4 manual is exactly what catches the subtle bracket and pinpoint errors this AGLC4 referencing guide has already covered.
AGLC4 across law school assignment types
An AGLC4 referencing guide is useful across the different kinds of legal writing Australian law students produce — problem-question assignments citing case authority for a legal argument, research essays engaging with secondary scholarly commentary, and moot court submissions requiring precise, formal citation of both cases and legislation. Each assignment type draws on the same underlying Australian Guide to Legal Citation rules, but the balance between case citations, legislative citations, and secondary-source citations often shifts depending on the specific assignment's focus.
A final checklist before submitting AGLC4-referenced work
Before submitting any assignment referenced under AGLC4, run through a short final check: does every footnote correspond to a substantive citation rather than commentary, are case citations using the correct bracket type and report-series abbreviation, does legislation include the correct jurisdiction abbreviation, is there a pinpoint reference for every direct quote or specific claim, and does the bibliography correctly separate cases, legislation, and secondary sources into their own categories? This final pass, guided by a careful AGLC4 referencing guide rather than assumption, catches the overwhelming majority of AGLC-specific errors before submission.
Why understanding AGLC4 matters beyond a single assignment
Learning the Australian Guide to Legal Citation properly, rather than reconstructing the rules from scratch for every new assignment, pays off considerably across an entire law degree where AGLC footnote citation is used consistently from first-year problem questions through to a final-year research thesis. Once the core logic — footnote citation with a full categorised bibliography, pinpoint references for specific claims, and jurisdiction-specific legislative abbreviations — is genuinely familiar, applying it to an unfamiliar source type becomes a matter of adapting a known pattern rather than starting from confusion each time.
AGLC4 for international and comparative legal sources
Australian law degrees increasingly involve comparative or international material — a UK case cited alongside Australian authority, or a piece of international law scholarship discussed alongside domestic legislation. This AGLC4 referencing guide notes that the Australian Guide to Legal Citation includes specific rules for citing foreign cases and international materials, distinct from the domestic case-citation rules covered earlier, since the citation needs to clearly identify the originating jurisdiction and report series even when that series follows different conventions from Australian reports.
Common pinpoint reference mistakes under AGLC4
Pinpoint references are one of the most frequently mishandled details this AGLC4 referencing guide sees in student work. A pinpoint reference should point to the specific page, paragraph, or section that supports the exact claim being made, not merely to the general starting page of the case or source. Australian Guide to Legal Citation conventions expect this precision consistently, and a marker checking a footnote against the cited passage can tell quickly when a pinpoint reference has been added generically rather than checked against the actual source text.
Using an AGLC4 referencing guide alongside your law school's own style sheet
Most Australian law schools publish their own condensed style sheet summarising the AGLC4 rules students use most often, and this AGLC4 referencing guide is best used alongside that school-specific document rather than in place of it. Where the two differ on a minor formatting point — a specific abbreviation, for instance — your law school's own current guidance takes precedence, since some schools adopt slight local variations on top of the base Australian Guide to Legal Citation rules.
AGLC footnote citation for online and non-traditional sources
Increasingly, legal research draws on sources beyond traditional print reports and journals — government websites, online-only case commentary, and digital legislative databases. AGLC footnote citation conventions extend to these source types with specific rules for including access dates and URLs where appropriate, while still following the same underlying citation logic as print sources. This AGLC4 referencing guide recommends checking the current Australian Guide to Legal Citation manual directly for online-source conventions, since these rules are updated more frequently than the core case and legislation citation rules as digital legal research practices continue to evolve.
AGLC4 footnote placement and punctuation conventions
Beyond getting the content of each footnote right, this AGLC4 referencing guide also covers where the footnote number itself belongs relative to punctuation. The Australian Guide to Legal Citation convention places the superscript footnote number after the relevant punctuation mark — typically after a comma or full stop — rather than before it, which is a small but consistently checked detail in Australian law school marking. A footnote number placed before punctuation, even when everything else about the citation is correct, is exactly the kind of small formatting slip an AGLC footnote citation review should catch before submission.
Revising a long piece of legal writing for AGLC4 consistency
For a longer piece of legal writing — a research essay, a dissertation chapter, or a moot submission — this AGLC4 referencing guide recommends a dedicated final revision pass focused purely on citation consistency, separate from checking the substantive legal argument itself. Read through every footnote in sequence, confirming that case citations use consistent bracket conventions, those legislative citations consistently include jurisdiction abbreviations, and that the bibliography's categorised sections match every source actually cited in the footnotes. This kind of dedicated, citation-focused pass catches errors that are easy to miss when reviewing for legal substance and formatting simultaneously.
Related resources
See Referencing Guides for other citation styles, or Law for broader legal writing support.
Frequently Asked Questions
No — they're separate footnote-based legal citation systems for different jurisdictions. AGLC4 is specific to Australian legal citation; OSCOLA is UK-specific. If you're studying at an Australian law school, always confirm your school expects AGLC4 rather than assuming UK conventions apply.
Where you're citing a specific passage, page, or paragraph — such as for a direct quote or a specific legal principle — a pinpoint reference is expected as part of AGLC footnote citation, not just the general citation to the case or source.
The Australian Guide to Legal Citation is published by the Melbourne University Law Review Association and is freely available online; most Australian law schools also publish their own quick-reference summary of the parts students use most often.